|
July 3, 2006 |
|
|
|
Political Profile of Members of the |
|
|
|
A 1958 amendment to the Kansas Constitution created the Supreme Court Nominating Commission. This group interviews candidates for openings on the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals, and names three finalists. The governor makes the final decision from these three finalist. Commission member David J Rebein explains Supreme Court Nominating Commission Goes To Work: Are You The Next Kansas Supreme Court Justice? in the Nov 2002 JoCo Bar newsletter. Unfortunately, this system provides little accountability. Perhaps the makeup of this group has always been quite political, but rarely reported by the press. The Governor can blame the commission for the nominations and takes no responsibility The decision process of the Commission is unknown since it operates in secrecy without any oversight. What is known about the members of the Supreme Court Nominating Commission? The names of this Commission are listed on p. 99 of this PDF file (document page 188), Executive Offices, Departments, Boards and Commissions, from the Kansas Secretary of State. |
Do we want political activists picking the Supreme Court Justices in Kansas?
|
Chair, Elected Statewide by Attorneys |
||
| Congressional District |
Elected by Attorneys | Appointed by the Governor |
| 1 | David J
Rebein, Republican,
Dodge City; President of Kansas Bar Association Contributor to: Jerry Moran $500 ('05'); Pat Roberts $1500 ('05), $1000 ('02); Sam Brownback $1000 ('03); Kansas Republican State Committee $1000 ('06), $500 ('04), $2000 ('03), $2000 ('02), $1000 ('01) Member since 2002. |
Carolyn Bird, Democrat,
Hays
Contributor to: Sebelius: $150 ('02), $1000 ('03), $2000 ('05), $1000 (husband, '05), $2000 ( husband's law firm, '05) Appointed by Sebelius in 2006. Appointed by Finney in 1993. |
| 2 | Thomas E.
Wright, Democrat,
Topeka; Board of Directors of Topeka Bar Association (2006) Contributor to Sebelius $1000 ('05), $1000 ('02), $500 ('01), $100 ('96); John Kerry $250 ('04); Nancy Boyda $250 ('04); Dennis Moore $200 ('98) Member since 2006? replacing Patricia E. Riley. "Jury Can Decide Whether Fetus Suffered In Abortion, Judge Says," Wichita Eagle, Feb 24, 1989: Thomas E. Wright, a Topeka attorney ... argued that a non-viable fetus was not a person within the meaning of the state's wrongful death statute. Chair of the Topeka-Shawnee County Consolidation Commission (2005). Another Sebelius connection? |
Dale E. Cushinberry, Democrat,
Topeka
No known political contributions In Topeka, as many as 123 Hispanic students were absent from Highland Park High School on Monday ...Principal Dale Cushinberry ... attended the protest to support students carrying Mexican flags April 11, 2006 Appointed by Sebelius in 2003. |
| 3 | Thomas J. Bath,
Jr. Republican for Moore '02 & '04, Overland Park Contributor to Paul Morrison: $2000 ('05) + $2000 (wife, '05); David Adkins: $100 ('00), $100 ('01), $200 ('02); Dennis Moore $350 ('04), $300 ('03), $500 ('98); Phill Kline: $400 ('02), $500 (wife, '02); John Vratil: $100 (law office, '99); Chris Biggs $350+$100+$544+250 ('02); David Adkins $50 ('02), $150 ('01); State Rep Paul Davis $100 ('03); State Senator Laura Kelly $250 ('03), $250 ('04) Member since 2000. Bath, a former assistant district attorney in Johnson County, was honored as Kansas prosecutor of the year in 1991, KC Star, Sept 6, 1994. |
Vivien
Jennings, Democrat,
Fairway
Contributor to: Dennis Moore $250 ('04), $250 ('03) Rainy Day Books owner, Vivien Jennings, sponsored events in the Kansas City area for Bill Clinton (June 22, 2004), Hillary Clinton (April 12, 2003), Al & Tipper Gore (Nov 24, 2002), Caroline Kennedy (Sept 26, 2005), Jane Fonda (Apr 20, 2005), Michael Moore (Oct 7, 2004), John McCain (Dec 16, 2005). Appointed by Sebelius in 2004. |
| 4 | Lee H.
Woodard, Democrat,
Wichita
Contributor to: Democratic Senate Candidates Brown $50 and Firestone $50. Law Firm Contributions: Sebelius $1000 ('03), $500 ('02), $500 ('01), $500 ('98). Graves $1000 ('98), $500 ('96), $600 ('95); Carlos Nolla $250 ('02), $200 ('02); Nat'l Republican Congressional Committee $300 ('02) Member since 2001. "It's the 2005 Weepers," Wichita Eagle, Dec. 31, 2005: To the Wichita Bar Association and attorney Lee H. Woodard, who, despite the pleas from community groups and generous monetary offers, bulldozed the historic Fidelity Title building downtown to make way for a handful of parking spaces. |
Dr. David N. Farnsworth, Democrat,
Wichita
Contributor to: ProKanDo PAC $100 (3/16/2004), Bob Knight $200
('04); Appointed
by Sebelius in 2005 "Retired Dean Chosen to Pick Justices", Wichita Eagle, July 26, 2005
|
|
If there is a limit on the number of members of any one political party for the Kansas Governmental Ethics Commission, why is there no similar restriction on the members of the Supreme Court Nominating Commission? Why is a single, minority, political party allowed to run such a Commission? By her recent replacement of Republican Debbie Nordling with Democrat Carolyn Bird, Governor Kathleen Sebelius has now appointed all Democrats to the Supreme Court Nominating Commission. This might be a good system if attorneys were interested only in law and justice, and not politics and political agendas, and if the governor were more interested in fairness for all Kansans instead of appointing those that have given political money or will support political agendas. But that simply is not the case. The well-intentioned 1958 Kansas constitutional amendment has caused problems it was intended to fix, and now needs to be fixed itself. Do the "elected" attorneys represent themselves and other attorneys, or do they represent all the citizens? Do the appointees represent the governor to whom they've given political contributions, or do they represent all the citizens? Since the Supreme Court Nominating Commission appears to be a political, partisan, group, but is being hidden from the voters, why not bring this process into the light of day? Why not let voters have a say in electing supreme court justices, instead of only retention elections? Or, at least let's have have a public hearing about the qualifications of nominees to such an important governmental commission instead of the secrecy the surrounds this group so the wisdom of the Governor's appointments can have some public review? Why not confirmation by the Kansas Senate? The political makeup of the Supreme Court Nominating Commission parallels the political makeup of the Supreme Court itself:
Why do neither of these groups reflect the political makeup of Kansans? |
|
|
|
Historical Notes about Kansas Supreme Court Nominating Commission:
Why is the Wichita Eagle the only newspaper that ever reports such information? |
|
|
Related articles:
|
|
|
|
efg
|
|
K a n s a s M e a d o w l a r k @ e f g 2 . c o m |