|
November 27, 2004 |
|
|
|
Connections between mysterious "SDC PAC," |
|
|
|
A mysterious political action committee, named the "SDC PAC", sent out a "hit"
piece against Dennis Pyle for State Senate District #1 just prior to the November general
election. The following shows two political mailings, which were sent to registered voters in Wamego from the SDC PAC and the Kansas Democratic Party, had some uncanny similarities: |
| Note the three
numbers at the top left of this 8.5"-by-5.5" mailing, and
notice the line at the bottom left, "Paid for by SDC PAC." |
![]() |
![]() |
| The Kansas Democratic Party sent out at least two mailings in the
Senate District 1 race. The mailing shown below was a "hit piece" attacking Republican Dennis Pyle. |
| Note the SAME three numbers at the top left of this 8.5"-by-5.5" mailing. |
![]() |
| The second mailing by the Kansas Democratic Party in the Senate
District 1 race was a pro-education piece in support of Democrat Tom Kautz. |
Are these just coincidences in these State Senate 1 mailings?
What is known about the quotation attributed to Dennis Pyle from the SDC PAC mailing? The mailing cites the Atchison Globe, Monday, October 18, 2004:
Did a reporter from the Atchison Globe get this quotation from Dennis Pyle? No! This quotation was part of a letter to the editor by Clark Balderson, of Wamego. So the SDC PAC mailing should have cited Clark Balderson of Wamego for this quotation instead of the Atchison Globe. Isn't this how propaganda works? Here's the complete Balderson letter, which is still online at the Atchison Globe: Tom Kautz deserves support in his run for District 1 seat (The exact same unedited letter also appeared on p. 10 of the Oct 21, 2004 Wamego Times.)
In this letter Clark Balderson's description seems quite condescending and he appears to be twisting Pyle's words. Most Republicans do not like judicial activism, but Balderson twists the meaning of Pyle's opposition to judicial activism. Balderson seems to be saying that anyone opposing judicial activism is a racist -- and an extremist! Isn't this logic a bit extreme itself? In a democratic republic, the judiciary is supposed to only interpret laws, including the Constitution, instead of usurping the power of the legislature to make new laws. Isn't Balderson's statement "it scares me to think our state legislature might become dominated by such extremists" a condemnation of conservative Republicans? What facts are known about Clark Balderson and his political agenda? Balderson's statement in his letter about being from a longtime Republican family is true. His dad, the late Willard Balderson, was highly respected in Wamego (see Manhattan Mercury, Jan, 6, 2002: "Balderson, leading citizen of Wamego , dies") and was a generous contributor to the Republican party and a number of Republican candidates. But what about Clark Balderson himself? Open Secrets shows that Clark Balderson, a "lifelong Republican" contributed to at least two Democratic candidates for Congress:
Was Balderson sincere in his statement "it is not an easy decision to support anyone other than a Republican for any office" when Balderson has twice given money to Democrats for U.S. Congress? Balderson's contributions to former Kansas Governor Bill Graves gives some other clues about his political agenda. From the Kansas Governmental Ethics web site: GRAVES, BILL 11-15-1994 BALDERSON S CLARK 500.00 GRAVES, BILL
09-07-1995 BALDERSON, S CLARK 2000.00 GRAVES, BILL
What happened in 1995, which was not an election year, to spark the $2000 contribution to Graves? The Wichita Eagle gives the answer
About a month after being appointed the president of the Kansas Art Commission, Balderson gave $2000 to Graves. Was Balderson mixing the arts and his politics? Clark's interest is in the arts has expanded from the Columbian Theatre to the Oz museum in Wamego, and even movies his son now produces:
Clark's direct connection to the SDC PAC is not clear, however. Was he personally motivated to write the letter to the Atchison Globe and Wamego Times? Or did someone else orchestrate this letter as part of a bigger SDC PAC plan? The SDC PAC does not appear on the list of PACs published by the Kansas Governmental Ethics Office! Why? To find all the political money players in Kansas, one must consult at least three lists. The PAC list shows all the PACs, but there is a separate list of political party committees, and the list of political candidate committees. Unfortunately, these other lists are not online and must be purchased from the Secretary of State for $0.50/page. The "SDC PAC" isn't a "regular" PAC, and likely is a Democratic party PAC. Dr. Tiller's Pro Kan Do PAC report from October 25, 2004 provides a missing clue. In a flury of last-minute political contributions to various Democratic Party PACs in October, Pro Kan Do gave $5,000 to the "Senate Democratic Committee", PO Box 1811, Topeka KS. Is the "Senate Democratic Committee" the same as the "SDC PAC" that sent the Senate District 1 mailing? ProKanDo used a similar trick to hide a considerable amount of money in the August 2002 primary election. In 2002 ProKanDo contributed to "KDL" which months after the election was determined to be "Kansans for Democratic Leadership". Here is page 3 of ProKanDo's Schedule C from their Oct 25, 2004 report |

|
The first entry on this page of the ProKanDo report was a
contribution to Kansans for a Moderate Government. This entry was
described as part of the recent Kansas Meadowlark report, Dr.
Tiller hijacks education issue: What are the chances that the $25,000 in expenses paid Oct 15-18 by ProKanDo were received by these Democratic party groups after the Oct 21, 2004 filing deadline? Will we need to wait till the January 2005 filing to find out what was done with this ProKanDo money? The Kansas Meadowlark will update this page as additional information becomes available. This developing story makes the recent information about the General Counsel for KS Governmental Ethics Commission Contributing to ProKanDo even more troubling. |
|
|
| efg |
|
K a n s a s M e a d o w l a r k @ e f g 2 . c o m |